Search for: "In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2017, 12:33 pm
In connection with a request for an anti-suit injunction that would prevent Apple from pursuing antitrust litigation in other jurisdictions, Qualcomm tried to interpret Mr. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 7:50 am
Qualcomm antitrust litigation, particularly in its opposition to the FTC's motion for summary judgment on chipset-level licensing, Qualcomm disputed that cellular standards are implemented by baseband chips. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm
Here's the joint case management statement the parties just filed to state their divergent positions:In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:17-md-2773-JSC, N.D. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 11:24 am
The appeal will take time, but we're talking about roughly a year. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
On Tuesday, "[a]fter carefully considering the briefing and conducting oral argument on August 3, 2023," Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Qualcomm's motion for summary judgment in its entirety: In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation (case no. 17-md-02773-JSC, N.D. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 8:07 am
Qualcomm surprisingly didn't bring mandatory infringement counterclaims, thereby waiving its right to assert infringement in that litigation or any other U.S. case against Apple. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:23 pm
Qualcomm will definitely want to avoid the January antitrust trial, but the FTC is on the winning track.Today's order also strengthens the position of consumer plaintiffs in their class action against Qualcomm (in which they're seeking $5 billion in damages, which would have to be paid out to up to 250 million consumers). [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
" (ACT's brief also contains some quotes from the Qualcomm-Broadcom litigation of about a decade ago.)A more interesting point that Qualcomm raises in the duty-to-deal context is that "a 'price squeeze' claim is not cognizable under antitrust law without a duty to deal or below-cost pricing" under the Supreme Court's 2009 linkLine ruling. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 5:05 am
NOTE: Plaintiff asked the district court to postpone ruling on the motion to dismiss until the Ninth Circuit issued its ruling in In re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litig., 536 F.Supp.2d 1129 (N.D. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:17 pm
Formally, there are two cases, which the court combined under the official caption In re Qualcomm litigation. [read post]
12 May 2017, 1:28 pm
In my initial reaction (of early April) I had also disagreed with Qualcomm's emphasis on litigation against competitors and noted that sometimes they do sue. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:46 pm
And that's where the beef really is.Apple and the contract manufacturers' 13 joint motions in limineJudge Curiel granted the motion to exclude testimony and argument regarding Apple non-SEP litigation. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:47 pm
Qualcomm antitrust trial in the Northern District of California, and Judge Lucy H. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:53 am
In December, LG (re)joined the Korean antitrust case against Qualcomm. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:36 am
Apple is now embroiled in a particularly intense and escalating fight with Qualcomm, and there may be reasons for which they're particularly proactive, though Samsung isn't just sitting by idly. [read post]
16 May 2017, 10:40 am
They're in their right to speak out just like I can read court filings and comment on them quickly. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 5:13 am
It was a resounding victory for Qualcomm's counsel from multiple firms under the strategic leadership of Cravath Swaine & Moore's Gary Bornstein, whose work for Epic Games (against Apple and Google) I have mentioned many times.Still, there is a class action pending in the Northern District of California: In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust litigation, but no longer before Judge Lucy H. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:56 am
Samsung, Apple did not get its preferred way forward (affirmance of prior damages verdict and an immediate re-retrial necessitated by the Federal Circuit's dismissal of Apple's trade dress claims), but the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has granted Apple's wish that its contract, patent and antitrust action against Qualcomm be kept separate from a long list of (consumer) antitrust cases related to the FTC's… [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:39 am
The FTC and Qualcomm once intended to settle the antitrust litigation pending before Judge Lucy H. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:44 am
Qualcomm litigation, as their open letter to President Trump shows.It may also explain why Qualcomm doesn't want Judge Koh to treat other Qualcomm FRAND antitrust cases (particularly in the EU and in South Korea) as related cases.But the BlackBerry story also shows that Qualcomm paints a rosy picture when it claims that the industry at large has accepted its royalty rates, with only Apple and Samsung allegedly trying to avoid paying a fair… [read post]
